AI Fact Checking & Verification Service
We check every claim, number and source in your AI-written reports and content before anyone else reads them.
What you get
- Claim-by-Claim Verification
Every factual claim in the document is independently verified against primary sources. No claim goes unchecked.
- Source Link for Every Fact
Each verified claim gets a source link. Your stakeholders can verify anything themselves with one click.
- Hallucination Detection
AI-fabricated statistics, fake citations, invented quotes, and plausible-but-false claims identified and flagged.
- Confidence Scoring
Each claim scored: Verified (high confidence), Partially Verified, Unverifiable, or Contradicted by Evidence.
- Correction Suggestions
For flagged claims, we provide the correct information with sources, ready to plug in.
- Trust Certification
Verified documents receive an Elevated Signal trust certification, which shows stakeholders the due diligence was done.
How it works
- Step 1Document Submission
Send us the AI-generated document: PDF, Word, or any format. We accept reports, articles, analyses, and marketing content.
- Step 2Multi-Agent Verification
Multiple independent AI agents fact-check every claim against primary sources, databases, and verified public records.
- Step 3Cross-Model Validation
Findings cross-checked across different AI models to catch model-specific blind spots and biases.
- Step 4Annotated Report
You receive the original document annotated with verification status, source links, confidence scores, and corrections.
Scope, methods and delivery
The problem we address
AI generates impressive-looking reports. But how do you know they're accurate? LLMs hallucinate facts, invent statistics, and cite sources that don't exist. If you're presenting AI-generated analysis to clients, investors, or regulators, one hallucinated fact can destroy your credibility.
Our approach
Send us any AI-generated document. Our multi-agent verification system independently fact-checks every claim, traces every statistic to its source, flags claims it can't support, and returns an annotated report with confidence scores and source links. Think of us as an independent auditor for AI-generated content.
Why AI-written claims need a separate check
Hallucinations remain a documented risk in language-model output. OpenAI's 2025 research argues they persist because standard training and evaluation reward confident guessing over admitting uncertainty.
A second model alone doesn't fix that: different models tend to get the same questions right and wrong, so agreement between them proves little. Our verification pass checks each claim against primary evidence, links the evidence it found, and flags unresolved or conflicting claims for human review. That's verification-as-a-service.
What gets verified, and against what
For each AI-generated artifact — a report, press release, deck, brief, customer email, analysis memo — the verification layer checks:
- Every numeric claim against an authoritative source
- Every named-entity reference against a canonical record
- Every quoted statement against the primary publication
- Every cited statistic against the underlying study
Sources are tiered. Primary government data, peer-reviewed research, audited financial filings, and direct-from-vendor pricing pages weight higher than secondary or tertiary sources.
The data fabric draws from public datasets we maintain: regulatory and enforcement records, SEC filings, USPTO patents and trademarks, IRS Form 990 disclosures, federal and state contract databases, healthcare regulatory records, and a long-running archive of consumer discussions. When a claim cannot be matched to a verifiable source, it's flagged for human review rather than silently accepted.
What you get back
The verification report on a piece of content is a structured document. Each claim is listed and scored:
- Green — high-confidence verified, with citation
- Yellow — partially supported, with the gap noted
- Red — unsupported or contradicted, with disconfirming source linked
The summary section gives you a single decision: ship-as-is, ship-with-edits, or do-not-ship.
Turnaround runs from 30 minutes (short-form content like a press release) to 24-48 hours (long-form content like an analyst report or due-diligence memo). Volume contracts integrate via API so verification runs automatically before publish.
Where this fits in your stack
Verification-as-a-service fits any organization producing volume AI-generated output for external audiences with reputational or legal exposure:
- Marketing copy at scale
- AI-drafted client communications in regulated verticals
- AI-summarized research reports
- AI-assisted compliance documentation
- Customer-support knowledge-base content
It also fits internal use cases where decisions hinge on AI-summarized data — board materials, investment memos, regulatory filings.
It does not fit purely internal exploratory work where the cost of an occasional wrong claim is small and bounded. The economics work where a single wrong claim costs more than a year of verification — which is most external-facing content for any brand with reputation value.
Verification-as-a-Service questions
What is AI fact-checking?
What types of documents can you verify?
How accurate is AI fact-checking compared to human fact-checkers?
Can an AI chat assistant fact-check itself?
How long does verification take?
What does the verified document look like?
Trust, but verify
Send us any AI-generated document. We fact-check every claim and return it annotated with sources, corrections, and confidence scores.